JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This is an application for review of the order dated 3rd July, 2006 passed
by this Court in disposing of the appeal preferred by the appellant.
(2.) The appellant is the recorded bargadar in respect of the lands in
question which were acquired under the provisions of the West Bengal
Industrial Infrastructural Development Act, 1974. The concerned Collector while
awarding compensation for acquisition of the same did not award any
compensation whatsoever to the writ petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petitioner
moved a writ petition in this Court for a writ in the nature of mandamus
commanding the respondent authority to pass an award of compensation in
favour of the petitioner for the acquisition of the lands in question under the
provisions of the aforesaid Act. For the purpose of determination of
compensation for acquisition of the land under the provisions of the aforesaid
Act, the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 are applicable. Section
23 in its application to the State of West Bengal provides that the Court shall
take into consideration that the loss of earning, if any, caused to the person
interested, in consequence of the acquisition of the land where earning was
derived directly from such land. Sub-section 4 of Section 23 provides: -
"(4) Compensation payable to a bargadar for loss of earning under
clause seventhly of sub-section (1) shall not exceed six times the net
average annual income which the bargadar derived or might have
derived from the land during three years immediately proceeding the
date of acquisition."
(3.) Upon reading of the aforesaid provision of Section 23 of the Land
Acquisition Act, 1894, it is clear that this Court while disposing of the appeal
by the order dated 3rd July, 2006 made an error apparent on the record by
observing that the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 did not specifically provide for
giving compensation of the bargadars of the lands in addition to the owner of
the same. We, therefore, set aside the order under review and the application
for review is, thus, allowed.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.