CHAITNYA CHARAN DAS Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
LAWS(CAL)-1995-5-19
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on May 16,1995

CHAITNYA CHARAN DAS Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF WEST BENGAL Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

COUNCIL OF CIVIL SERVICE UNIONS V. MINISTER FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE [REFERRED TO]
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR NEW SOUTH WALES V. QUINN [REFERRED TO]
RE : CANADA ASSISTANCE PLAN [REFERRED TO]
RAJAT NATH ROY V. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
MAHISH KUMAR V. THE STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
MD. NAGIN AHMED V. THE STATE [REFERRED TO]
CALCUTTA GAS COMPANY PROPRIETARY LIMITED VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ORISSA VS. RAM CHANDRA DEV:MOHAN PRASAD SINGH DEO [REFERRED TO]
C S ROWJEE VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF PUNJAB VS. MODERN CULTIVATORS [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ORISSA VS. BINAPAIRI DEI [REFERRED TO]
ROHTAS INDUSTRIES VS. S D AGARWAL [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MYSORE VS. H SRINIVASMURTHY [REFERRED TO]
PRESIDENT OF INDIA VS. SPECIAL COURTS BILL 1978 [REFERRED TO]
RAMJI DAYAWALA AND SONS PRIVATE LIMITED VS. INVEST IMPORT [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. OSWAL WOOLLEN MILLS LTDOTHERS [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS. SWAIKA PROPERTIES [REFERRED TO]
KRISHAN KUMAR BALBIR SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
ANDI MUKTA SADGURU SHREE MUKTAJEE VANDAS SWAMI SUVARNA JAYANTI MAHOTSAV SMARAK TRUST VS. V R RUDANI [REFERRED TO]
R NAJRAYANAN VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
SITARAM SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED U P STATE SUGAR CORPORATION LIMITED VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION VS. D T C MAZDOOR CONGRESS ANB [REFERRED TO]
KUMARI SHRILEKHA VIDYARTHI VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF BIHAR VS. P P SHARMA IAS [REFERRED TO]
SURJA VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
SHRISHT DHAWAN VS. SHAW BROTHERS [REFERRED TO]
DULICHAND VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA BHILLAI ENGINEERING CORPORATION ANUP MALLEABLES BURN STANDARD CO TEXMACO CIMMCO TITAGARH STEELS VS. HINDUSTAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION:UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
MUKUND LAL BHANDARI VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY VS. VINAY ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
S P CHENGALVARAYA NAIDU VS. JAGANNATH [REFERRED TO]
OIL AND NATURAL GAS COMMISSION VS. UTPAL KUMAR BASU [REFERRED TO]
TATA CELLULAR VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
MADRAS CITY WINE MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION A J JOY RAMANATHAPURAM MADURAI DISTT LIQUOR DEALERS ASSOCIATION VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [REFERRED TO]
BLOOM DEKOR LIMITED BLOOM DEKOR LIMITED VS. SUBHASH HIMATLAL DESAI:ARVIND B SHETH [REFERRED TO]
TEJ SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
GIRDHARI LAL VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
SUKH LAL VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
KAJARIA EXPORTS LTD VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
PANU CHARAN VS. STATE OF ORISSA [REFERRED TO]
RAMLAL DUTTA VS. UNDER SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
S PONNUSWAMY VS. GOVT OF T N [REFERRED TO]
P P CHOCKALINGA NADAR VS. GOVT OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
S P V RAMASWAMY VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [REFERRED TO]
INCOME-TAX OFFICER VS. B B MITTAL [REFERRED TO]
RAM EKBAL PRASAD VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
SONE VANASPATI VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]



Cited Judgements :-

R C GUPTA VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER [LAWS(DLH)-2006-6-11] [RELIED ON]
H M Brothers Pvt LTD VS. Union of India UOI [LAWS(CAL)-1997-2-32] [REFERRED TO]
Secretary Indian Tea Association VS. Ajit Kumar Barat [LAWS(CAL)-1999-3-10] [REFERRED TO]
MAKHAN BALA MIDDYA AND 29 ORS VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(CAL)-2002-2-41] [REFERRED TO]
NIRANJAN MONDAL VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(CAL)-2004-7-10] [REFERRED TO]
INDU BHUSAN JANA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(CAL)-2008-9-28] [REFERRED TO]
WEST BENGAL FREEDOM FIGHTERS ORGANIZATION VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2004-8-58] [REFERRED TO]
INDU BHUSAN JANA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(CAL)-2008-9-31] [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. SHRI SHYAMAPADA PRAMANICK [LAWS(CAL)-2011-1-111] [REFERRED TO]
SONE VANASPATI VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-1994-1-21] [REFERRED TO]
VIVEKANANDA MONDAL VS. MINATI MONDAL [LAWS(CAL)-1997-12-38] [REFERRED TO]
SMT. SUMITRA PATRA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(CAL)-2007-4-78] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)The petitioners in these applications are said to be the freedom fighters and/or their dependents. They have filed these writ applications praying, inter alia, for a direction upon the respondents to pay freedom fighters' pension under 'Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme' (hereinafter referred to as 'Scheme') with effect from 1-8-1980.
(2.)The basis fact of the matter is not in dispute.
(3.)A scheme was initially made by the Central Government with effect from 15/08/1972 providing for grant of pension to living freedom fighters, and their families, if they are no more alive and to the families of martyrs. The minimum amount of pension payable to the eligible candidate was Rs. 200.00 per month and in the case of families the sum would vary from Rs. 100.00 to Rs. 200/per month. However not more than one member of a family was to be granted pension.
;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.