IMPEX METAL & FERRO ALLOYS LTD. Vs. UNION OF INDIA
LAWS(CAL)-2015-2-106
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on February 03,2015

Impex Metal And Ferro Alloys Ltd. Appellant
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) The Court: The writ petitioner challenges the order dated 30th September, 2014 of the Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Drawback Department (Port). Mr. Chowdhury, learned counsel for the petitioner argues that this matter has to be heard by this Court and appropriate orders passed. On the other hand, Mr. Bharadwaj, learned counsel for the respondents takes the point that the petitioner has an adequate remedy in the Appellate forum provided under the Customs Act, 1962. The questions are highly disputed and this Court should not go into these disputed questions of facts.
(2.) The order made by the Deputy Commissioner, in my opinion, has become a little vulnerable because of the finding at internal page 5 of the order to the following effect: "I find that in the provisions of the Act, supra, the two very important aspects to be fulfilled are that: (i) the goods should be capable of being easily identified; (ii) to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs. In the present case, I find that the Deputy Commissioner of Customs at the point of export has not been fully satisfied that the identity of the goods has been established. It has been clearly stated in the examination report dated 14-9-2012, that 'identity of the goods could not be established in authentic manner'. Since the Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of Customs at the point of export is the proper persons to establish the identity of the re-exported goods, vis-a-vis the imported goods; his examination report is final and irrevocable. He is the person who has to be satisfied as to the identity of the goods, and when he is not satisfied, fully and without doubt, then the whole claim becomes non-sustainable."
(3.) Now, Mr. Chowdhury shows me a report dated 14th September, 2012 prepared by the Deputy Commissioner of Customs (Haldia Dock). If one goes by the date mentioned in the impugned order one tends to form the opinion that this report of 14th September, 2012 has been referred to therein. The quoted words cannot be found in this report.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.