Asha Arora, J. - (1.) THE petitioner retired from service on 31.10.2003 as Sub -Assistant Engineer (for short referred to as SAE). He filed Original Application No. 2942 of 2005 before the West Bengal State Administrative Tribunal praying inter alia for an order directing the respondents to refix the scale of pay in terms of G.O. No. 6075 -F dated 21.6.1990 and G.O. No. 3015 -F dated 13.3.2001 in respect of Career Advancement Scheme (for brevity referred as CAS) and pay all arrears including interest and further directing the respondents to issue fresh pension payment order after giving the benefit of such CAS Scheme, 1990. It is the petitioner's contention that he is a diploma holder in engineering. He joined as Amin under the Settlement Officer, Murshidabad and Birbhum on 8.4.1974. The Finance Department, Government of West Bengal issued a notification No. 10303 -F dated 19.11.74 which stated that all diploma holder engineers were entitled to be termed as SAE to get the benefit including pay and allowances of the said post. The aforesaid benefit having not been extended to the petitioner, he filed a writ petition being C.R. No. 2244 (W) of 1980 in the High Court and the same was allowed on 16.12.1987 directing the respondents to take immediate steps for treating him as SAE and paying him all the service benefits to which he would have been entitled had he been treated as SAE in terms of the said notification. vide Memo dated 14.8.91 the petitioner was redesignated as SAE and the pay of SAE was allowed with initial fixation at Rs. 330/ -. In the meantime the petitioner retired from service on 31.10.2003 and clearance to Accountant General in his favour was issued on 21.7.2003. It is the further contention of the petitioner that the Accountant General issued pension payment order (for short referred as PPO) but the copy was not handed over to him. Not having received pension and commuted value of pension, petitioner filed O.A. No. 1356 of 2004 before the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal on 23.9.2004 which was disposed of by the Tribunal by directing the respondents to release his pensionary benefits within a specified period. Accordingly, the pensionary benefits of the petitioner were released in the grade and scale of SAE but the benefit of Career Advancement Scheme was not given to him. According to the petitioner, since he did not get any promotion during his service, under the CAS he is entitled to get benefit on completion of 10 years of service with effect from 1.4.1989 and 20 years of service with effect from 1.4.1994 as well as on completion of 25 years of service with effect from 1.4.2001.
(2.) THE State Administrative Tribunal by its order dated 26.4.2011 dismissed the petitioner's application with the following observation: "The basic scale in this case is the scale that he had received on joining that is, the scale of Amin. It is true that he was redesignated in terms of the judgment of the Hon'ble Court but his initial appointment as Amin cannot be disregarded and it cannot also be contested that he received advancement far higher than what he could have received under CAS benefit, had he continued as Amin. Therefore, he is not entitled to any further benefit under CAS in terms of the order dated 21.6.90 and 13.3.2001." Aggrieved, the petitioner brought the matter before this Court by filing the instant writ petition.
(3.) ASSAILING the impugned order Mr. Samar Banerjee, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Tribunal failed to consider that the post of SAE is direct recruitment post and not a promotional one and it has erroneously been held that the petitioner's initial appointment as Amin cannot be disregarded. In support of such submission Mr. Banerjee relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 1196 of 1986 (State of West Bengal and others v. Debdas Kumar and others) with Civil Appeal No. 830 of 1991 (State of West Bengal and others v. Kamal Kumar Bhdra and others) wherein it has been held that under the rules the post of sub -assistant engineer is not at all a promotional post for any categories of employees in the State. On the contrary, it is a direct recruitment post. Learned Counsel for the petitioner also referred to the judgment of a Single Bench of this Court in C.R. No. 2244 (W) of 1980 wherein the Court ruled in favour of the petitioner by directing the respondents "to take immediate steps for treating him as Sub -Assistant Engineer and to pay all the service benefits to which he would have been entitled had he been treated as sub -assistant engineer in terms of the notification dated November 19, 1974.";