JUDGEMENT
ASHIM KUMAR ROY, J. -
(1.) All the 8 appellants, namely, Bharat Paramanick, Nemai
Paramanick, Naren Paramanick, Ganesh Paramanick, Chaitanya
Paramanick, Nilu Paramanick, Babu Paramanick and Khagen
Paramanick were placed on trial before the learned Additional
Sessions Judge, First Track, 1st Court, Krishnagar, Nadia to
answer the charges under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC
and under Section 323 IPC simplicitor.
(2.) During the trial, the prosecution relied on total 16 witnesses. Its case essentially based on the evidence of eye -
witnesses, who are Probodh Pramanick (P.W./4), Promila
Pramanick (P.W./5), Subrata Pramanick (P.W./6), Krittibas
Pramanick (P.W./7), Uttam Pramanick (P.W./8), Santibala
Pramanick (P.W./9), Ganesh Biswas (P.W./10), Debabrata
Pramanick (P.W./11) and Basudev Saha (P.W./13). Out of those
eye -witnesses, PW/5 Promila Pramanick, PW/6 Subrata
Pramanick and PW/9 Santibala Pramanick claimed to be injured
in the same incident. Whereas, the PW/1 held post -mortem on the
dead body and PW/2 is a doctor who examined the injured at
Santipur State General Hospital as also the victim Subal
Pramanick and declared him dead. The PW/12 is the scribe of the
FIR and PW/16 is the Investigating Officer of the case. However,
both the PW/14 and PW/15 were declared hostile. From the side of
the defence Dr. Arunava Das was examined as their only witness.
(3.) At the conclusion of the trial, the trial Judge found all the appellants guilty for having committed offence punishable
under section 302/149 IPC and sentenced them to suffer
imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 2000/ - each with
default clause. The appellants were also convicted under section
323 IPC and were sentenced to suffer R.I. for three months. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
In this appeal, the aforesaid order of conviction and
sentence is under challenge.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.