JUDGEMENT
Patwardhan, J. -
(1.) This is an application by V. V. Ramana
Murthy, working under District Electric Engineer, S. E. Railway, Koraput against
six respondents led by the General Manager, S. E. Railway, Garden Reach,
Calcutta, including Chief Personnel Officer, S.E. Railway, Calcutta, Chief
Administrative Officer, S.E. Railway, Vishakhapatnam, Dy. Chief Electrical
Engineer (Construction), Vishakhapatnam and Dy. Chief Personnel Officer
(Construction), Vishakhapatnam-all of S. E. Railway. The application has been
filed on 24.7.1996 and its reply under the signature of Mr. Susanta Kumar
Das, Dy. Chief Electrical Engineer (Construction), Vishakhapatnam as
respondent No. 5 filed on 4.1.1999.
(2.) Certain dates-admitted by both the parties, need to be quoted
at outset to appreciate the case easily. They are as follows :-
16.09.1980 District Engineer, S.E. Railway, Waltair, notifies ten
vacancies of Casual Supervising Mistry on daily rates of
pay in Civil Engineering Department of Waltair-Kirandul
Railway Electrification Project-candidates to possess
Diploma in Civil, Electrical or Mechanical Engineering.
17.11.1980 Applicant gets appointment letter.
21.10.1986 Applicant gets temporary status.
04.07.1991 Chief Administrative Officer, Vishakhapatnam, issues orders
regarding absorption of applicant in a Group 'D' post
describing him as Works Mistry.
26.07.1991 Applicant represents to Chief Personnel Officer, S.E.
Railway, Calcutta against proposal to absorb him in Group
'D' posts and requests to absorb him in Open Line as
Works Mistry.
Some time O.A. 347/1991 filed in C.A.T. Cuttack Bench by applicant
in 91 against the General Manager, S.E. Railway, Calcutta, Chief
Administrative Officer, S.E. Railway, Vishakhapatnam and
District Electrical Engineer (Construction), Korapat.
07.04.1995 O.A. 347/1991 disposed of with direction to respondents
to absorb him in Open Line in pay Scale Rs. 1,400-2300
immediately when the vacancy becomes available subject
to his seniority in the grade in which he was working.
06.11.1995 Hon'ble the Supreme Court of India dismisses S.L.R filed
by the respondents against the C.A.T. order of 7.4.1995.
(3.) We have heard the learned Counsel for both the parties and have
gone through the pleadings. The applicant has prayed for the following
reliefs :-
"(i) To direct the respondents to regularize the services of the
applicant in Group 'C' post in scale Rs. 1400-2300 (RP) from the
date the services of his juniors were regularised and to accord
all benefits arising out therefrom including seniority.
(ii) To direct the respondents to implement the order and judgement
of the Hon'ble Tribunal contained in Annexure 'M' hereof since
clear vacancies were and/or are there in the Open Line.
(iii) To direct the respondents to implement the order and judgement
of the Hon'ble Tribunal and consider the representations contained
in Annexure 'O' in the light of the order and judgement contained
in Annexure 'M' hereof and accord all benefits including monetary
as given to the juniors as also scale of pay and seniority as
Works Mistry and/or equivalent in the Open Line.
(iv) To direct the respondents to restore the seniority position of the
applicant reckoning the services rendered in the construction
line as Works Mistry.
(v) To draw and disburse all arrears consequential thereto.";
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.