JUDGEMENT
Ghose, J. -
(1.) This appeal is directed from an order dated February 7,
2005 whereby the Hon'ble First Court rejected an application filed by the
appellant under Section 8 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996
(hereinafter referred to as the said Act).
(2.) In this appeal two questions arose before us :-
(a) Whether the appeal is maintainable;
(b) Whether the agreement in question contained an Arbitration Clause.
(3.) Facts also pleaded in the petition that under an agreement dated
5th August, 1993 the appellant herein was to supply the chrome ore to the
respondent herein for conversion and for return of the finished materials to
the appellant herein. Accordingly, respondent started lifting the chrome ore
and receiving the same as well as coke from the appellant. The appellant
further incurred various expenses and raises its debit notes in respect thereof
as a result a sum of Rs. 2,51,60,753-81 have become due and payable by
the respondent to the appellant. Inspite of demands respondent failed to
pay the said amount and the appellant duly issued a notice under Section
433 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act)
and initiated the winding up proceeding for its claims. After instituting the
said proceedings by the appellant herein, the respondent filed a counterblast
suit on 9th January, 1998 and claimed a decree for a sum of Rs.5,12,64,200/-.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.