JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed
against the judgment and order dated 20th June, 2001 passed by the learned
Additional District Judge, 1st Court Jalpaiguri in Misc. Appeal No. 27 of
1999 affirming the order dated 20th September, 1999 passed by the
Authorized Officer, Jalpaiguri District & the Divisional Forest Officer,
Jalpaiguri Division.
(2.) By the order impugned, the order passed by the Authorized
Officer confiscating the vehicle No. WGV-4088 along with the tools, forest
produce seized by the State Government under Section 59a(3) of the Indian
Forest Act, 1927, was affirmed in appeal by the learned Additional District
Judge, 1st Court at Jalpaiguri.
(3.) Both the Authorized Officer as well as the learned Court below
concurrently held that a forest offence had been committed in respect of
the forest produce belonging to the State Government by the registered
owner of the vehicle being Vehicle No. WGV-4088 which was used in
commission of the said forest offence. Both the Authorized Officer as well
as the learned Court below also concurrently held that the owner of the
vehicle failed to prove that her vehicle was not used for carrying the said
forest produce without the knowledge or convenience of herself or her agent
or person in charge of the vehicle. Both the Authorized Officer as well as
the learned Court below further held that the owner of the vehicle failed to
prove that she herself or her agent or the person in charge of the vehicle
had taken all reasonable and necessary precautions against the
unauthorised use of the said vehicle for illegal transportation of the forest
produce belonging to the State Government.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.