JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The hearing stems from an application under Section 482 read with
Sections 397/401 Cr. P.C filed by the petitioner praying for setting aside
the order dated 14.11.2000 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate,
12th Court, Calcutta and quashing the proceeding being Case No.
C-153/99 against accused No. 4 Ananda Bazar Patrika.
(2.) The circumstances leading to the above application are that O. P.
No. 1 filed a complaint being registered as C-153/99 under Sections 500/501/502
I.P.C. against pro-O.P. Nos. 2 & 3 and the present petitioner who
are Executive Editor & Reporter, Editor, and Printer & Publisher respectively
of Ananda Bazar Patrika as also Ananda Bazar Patrika fiquring as accused
No. 4. As pro-O.P. Nos. 1 & 2 and the present petitioner are responsible for
the day to day affairs of the business and publication of the Ananda Bazar
Patrika, and Ananda Bazar Patrika is only a brand name of a newspaper
which is not a legal entity and is incapable of committing an offence of
defamation, and Ananda Bazar Patrika Ltd. is not a juristic person, the
petitioner filed a petition praying for recalling/withdrawal of summons issued
to accused No. 4 which was rejected by the impugned order.
(3.) Being aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner has preferred the
present application.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.