HINDUSTAN CASTING AND ENGINEERING CO Vs. UNION OF INDIA
LAWS(CAL)-2005-6-32
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on June 09,2005

HINDUSTAN CASTING AND ENGINEERING CO. Appellant
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

SOUMITRA PAL, J. - (1.) In the writ petition, the Petitioners have prayed for several reliefs. The relevant prayers are as under: "(a) issue a writ or in the nature of certiorari commanding the respondent, their men or agent to certify and transmit all the records had before it in relating to the instant case for the purpose of careful scrutiny by this Hon'ble Court and by rendering conscionable justice to the Petitioner by restraining the Respondent Authorities not to take any action and/or actions till disposal of the appeal pending before the learned Appellate Tribunal. (b) A writ or in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent Provident Fund Authorities not to take any action on the basis of Order dated February 25, 2003 till disposal of the appeal pending before the learned Appellate Tribunal. (c) A writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent Provident Fund Authorities to cancel, rescind, withdraw and/or quash the impugned notice dated May 6, 2003 and December 27, 2004 being Annexure P-11 and P-14 to this Writ petition."
(2.) The grievance of the Petitioners is notwithstanding the fact that an appeal has been preferred under Section 7-1 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (for short "the Act") against an order dated February 25, 2003 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Howrah and although an application has also been filed before the learned Tribunal for waiving and/or reducing the amount of deposit, yet the Provident Fund authorities by letters dated May 6, 2003 and December 27, 2004 have requested for payment of the amount due. It is submitted that the learned Tribunal should be directed to dispose of the application for waiver and/or reduction of deposit pending disposal of the application, the Respondents should be directed not to initiate proceedings for recovery.
(3.) Mr. Gupta submits that the Petitioners should be directed to deposit a part of the amount due since determined by the authorities. Heard the learned advocates for parties. Section 7-O of the Act is as under: "7-0. Deposit of amount due on filing appeal - No appeal by the employer shall be entertained by a Tribunal unless he has deposited with it seventy-five per cent of the amount due from him as determined by an officer referred to in Section 7-A: Provided that the Tribunal may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, waive or reduce the amount to be deposited under this Section.";


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.