JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The petitioners No. 1 and 2 are the tenants. The petitioner No. 3 is the
landlady. The petitioners No. 1 and 2 applied for new electric connection on
24th September, 2003 and 5th November, 2003 respectively. Their case is
that the West Bengal State Electricity Board (hereinafter referred to as the
Board) insisted that the application for supply of electricity should be made
by the landlady. It is also their case that at their insistence an application by
the landlady, the petitioner No. 3 herein, was filed on 24th November, 2003.
The Board after necessary inspection has issued a quotation dated 24th
November, 2003 by which payment of a sum of Rs. 1,28,387/- has been
demanded as a prerequisite for providing electric connection. It is in these
circumstances that the present writ petition was filed by the tenants and the
landlady praying for an order directing the State Electricity Board to give
connection to the petitioners No. 1 and 2 without insisting upon payment of
the said sum of Rs. 1,28,387/-.
(2.) The Board has filed an affidavit-in-opposition and thereafter, has
filed a supplementary affidavit which was affirmed by one Sri S. P. Kusari on
12th August, 2005. The sum and substance of the case of the Board is to be
found in the various sub-paragraphs of paragraph 13 of the said
supplementary affidavit. Briefly stated their case is that there are four 100
KVA transformers in the locality, where the commercial complex under
construction of which the petitioners No. 1 and 2 are the stallhoders, is
situate. According to the Board, all the four transformers have exhausted
their capacity. Five of the existing shoprooms have already been electrified
from out of one of the transformers and there is no scope for giving any
electric supply to any of the petitioners from the existing tansformers. The
commercial complex wherein the petitioners. The commercial complex
wherein the petitioners No. 1 and 2 have taken stalls is at present one storied
building, but the Board is of the view that there is scope for further
construction and it is likely to become a two storied shopping complex.
(3.) Mr. Panja, learned Advocate appearing for the Board submitted
that unless a new transformer is installed it is not possible to meet the
requirement of the shopping complex regard being had to the foreseeable
increase in the demand once the building is completely constructed. He,
therefore, submitted that a transformer has to be installed and for such
installation, the quotation has been issued. As and when the requisite
payment is made, the supply of electricity shall commence.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.