JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The above application is taken
out by the plaintiff in a money suit for pronouncing a final judgment and decree for a
sum of Rs. 71,77,420.62p. The suit filed by
the plaintiff for recovery of the sum of Rs.71,77,420.62p. inclusive of interest for the
goods sold and delivered. The case made out
by the plaintiff in the affidavit in support of
summons is that on diverse dates under the
diverse invoices the plaintiff sold and delivered a large quantity of ball bearings to the
defendant, the price of which was Rs. 1,73,80,127.81 p. Out of the aforesaid
amount, a sum of Rs. 1,28,92,200.19p. has
been paid by the defendant to the plaintiff
leaving a balance amount of Rs.44,87,927.62p. on account of principal. The
amount of interest has been claimed on the
aforesaid sum at an agreed rate which came
to be of a sum of Rs. 26,89,493.00p. calculated upto 31st August, 2002.
(2.) Mr. Pratap Chatterjee, learned Senior
Counsel appearing with Ms. Nadira Patherya
in support of this application contends that
in the affidavit-in-opposition no defence has
been made out to contest the suit by filing
written statement. The plea of limitation
taken by the defendant is of no substance
as there are part payments within the period of limitation and this will appear from
Annexure-"C". at pages 16 and 17 and Annexure-"D" at page 18 of
the affidavit-in-opposition of the affidavit affirmed on behalf of the plaintiff on 19th March, 2004.
(3.) It will appear from the pleadings and
the documents annexed thereto, that there
is continuous running account maintained
between the parties and this will be evident
from the payments made by the defendant
to the plaintiff on ad hoc basis between 28th
July, 1999 and 26th March, 2002. The
scheme for allowance of 5% turnover discount and one Maruti 800 Car and one
Maruti Esteem Car for sale of Rs. 1 crore
was available during the period from 1st
July, 1998 to 31st March, 1999 and was
applicable only in the event of full outstanding amount has been paid. In the instant
case, full outstanding amount has not been
paid within 31st March, 1999 and this will
be evident from the Annexure-"C" and Annexure-"D" and the plaintiffs affidavigt-in-opposition. As far
as claim of 2% cash discount is concerned Mr. Chatterjee replies
that such cash discount has been paid and
it will appear from the affidavit of the defendant itself.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.