JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) In the writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order dated 11.8.2003
transferring the dispute from the learned 2nd Industrial Tribunal where there
has been a prolonged vacancy to the learned 8th Industrial Tribunal.
(2.) Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the
said transfer of the dispute was carried out pursuant to a representation filed
by a workman. Since no copy of such representation was furnished to the
petitioner and as no hearing was given prior to such transfer, the order is bad
in law. In this regard, reliance has been placed on the judgment of the Apex
Court in Management of Nally Bharat Engineering Co. Ltd. vs. State of Bihar
& Ors., reported in 1990(2) SCC 48.
(3.) Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that
the judgment of the Supreme Court is not applicable on facts as in that case the
dispute was transferred from the Industrial Court in Dhanbad to the Industrial
Court in Patna.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.