JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The writ petitioner, a practising advocate of this Court
and appearing in person, is aggrieved by the notice dated April 8. 2005
issued by the disciplinary committee of Bar Council of West Bengal. By
it the committee notified to the petitioner that it would hold a meeting
on April 20, 2005 to enquire into and dispose of Case No. 20 of 2002.
(2.) Facts of the case are these. In a case filed by the fourth respondent
under section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 1973 the fifth
respondent was an opposite party. Feeling aggrieved by an order dated
April 10, 2002 made in that case by the executive magistrate, the fifth
respondent, engaging the petitioner as his advocate-on-record, took out
a criminal revision application before this Court; it was disposed of by
Debi Prasad Sengupta, J. on May 7, 2002. The petitioner communicated
the gist of the order to the executive magistrate, who, by order dated
May 8, 2002, disposed of the case.
(3.) Feeling aggrieved, the fourth respondent then took out a criminal
revision application before this Court. This time also the fifth
respondent engaged the petitioner as his advocate-on-record. The
application of the fourth respondent was also heard by Debi Prasad
Sengupta, J. His Lordship disposed of it by order dated May 21, 2002
holding, inter alia, that the petitioner had deliberately made a wrong
communication of the order dated May 7, 2002 to the executive
magistrate; and that the order communicated by the petitioner had
never been made.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.