JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The hearing stems from an application filed by the petitioners praying
for revision of the order dated 19.06.2004 passed by learned Additional
Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 2 at Purulia in Sessions Case No.
22/2004 (ST 21/2004) by way of setting aside the same.
(2.) The circumstances leading to the above application are that the
de facto-complainant Arun Sao lodged an FIR with Purulia Town P.S.
alleging that on 23.10.2003 at about 9.30 a.m. the present petitioners being
armed with deadly weapons trespassed into their house, threatened his
father with dire consequences if the partition suit is not withdrawn
immediately and on account of his protest, with a view to committing murder
assaulted him on different parts of his person including head resulting in
his bleeding injuries and unconsciousness. When the de-facto complainant
and his mother went to his rescue, they too were assaulted. After completion
of investigation the police submitted charge-sheet under Sections 452/323/
307/34 I.P.C., and charge was framed against the petitioners under Sections
147/452/34 and 307/34 I.P.C. on 19.06.2004.
(3.) Mr. Himangshu De, learned Counsel for the petitioners, at the
outset, submitted that though the impugned order dated 19.06.2004 has
been assailed on two-fold grounds, he is not pressing the ground of juvenility
of petitioners 2 & 3. As regards the other ground, on referring to the order
of anticipatory bail of the petitioners passed by the learned Additional
Sessions Judge-in-Charge, Purulia on 25.11.2003, Mr. De contended that
since the father of the informant is alleged to have sustained lacerated
injury over right parietal region, it may at best constitute an offence under
Section 324 or 325 I.P.C. and not under Section 307 in any way. Mr. R. S.
Chatterjee, learned Counsel for the State, on the other hand, supporting
the impugned order of framing charge under Section 307/34 and other
provisions of I.P.C., contended that whether the offence is one under Section
325 or 307 I.P.C. is a matter for trial and cannot be expected to be
determined at this stage.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.