JUDGEMENT
TARUN KUMAR GUPTA, J. -
(1.) THE petitioners have filed this application under Section 482 of the
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as the Code)
praying for quashing the proceedings of G. R. Case No.704 of 2012 under
Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of learned
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bidhannagar, North 24 Parganas.
(2.) IT is the case of the petitioners that O. P. No.2 Indrani Majumder being wife of Nabarun Chakraborty lodged a false complaint against her husband
and other in-laws alleging cruelty upon and misbehaviour with her.
Present petitioners are married sister-in-law (husband 's sister) and her
husband. The petitioners served notice upon O. P. No.1 State as well as
upon O. P. No.2 complainant. However, in spite of notice none appeared to
represent O. P. No.2 defacto complainant Indrani Majumder.
Debasish Roy appearing for the petitioners submits that the present petitioners being married sister-in-law and her husband were falsely
implicated in said criminal case. According to him, present petitioners
did not reside in the matrimonial home of the defacto complainant but
they were tagged in the complaint just being relations of her husband. He
further submits that the allegations made in the complaint did not
disclose commission of any offence under Section 498 A I. P. C. by the
present petitioners. According to him, further continuation of this
criminal proceeding against the present petitioners will amount to be an
abuse of process of the court and hence the same should be quashed.
(3.) IN support of his contention he has referred case laws reported in 2005 SCC (Cri) 735 (Ramesh and others vs. State of T. N.), (2010) 3 SCC (Cri) 473 (Preeti Gupta and another vs. State of Jharkhand and another), (2010) 2 C Cr. LR (SC) 75 (Bhaskar Lal Sharma and Another vs. Monica) and (2013) 1 SCC (Cri) 120 (Geeta Mehrotra and another vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another).;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.