JUDGEMENT
ASHIM KUMAR BANERJEE, J. -
(1.) ON April 10, 2011 one Mahadev Biswas the appellant above named went to the Havelock police station and informed the police personnel present
there, he committed murder of his wife Smti Jhunu Biswas in the
intervening night of April, 9 and April 10, 2011. He subsequently pleaded
''not guilty ''. He was charged with the offence under section 302 of the
Indian Penal Code.
Hence his trial.
EVIDENCE THAT THE PROSECUTION LED BEFORE THE COURT OF SESSION
(2.) THE prosecution examined 16 witnesses that would include the Doctor who conducted the post -mortem and also the police personnel involved in the
investigation.
PW -1 Shri S. Mohan
PW -1 the Sub Inspector of police deposed, he was in his quarter when Head
Moharir of the police station M.S. Yadav called him. He found Mahadev
Biswas present. He was told, last night he had quarrelled with his wife
and out of the rage and instigation he strangulated his wife, possibly
she died. He along with the other police personnel went to the place of
occurrence. On entering the room he saw the victim lying on the floor and
one child being 5 to 6 years old was sleeping beside her. He also found
froth coming out of the mouth of the victim. There was imprint of finger
on her neck. He informed the Station House officer who directed him to
post sentries. After coming back, he lodged FIR in the police station. In
cross examination, he admitted not having informed any Doctor. He did not
make any arrangement for taking the body of the victim to the hospital.
Between the police station and the place of occurrence PHC was situated.
He denied the suggestion, no sign of strangulation was present or any
blood was oozing out from the nostrils of the victim.
PW -2 Smti. Sabita Roy
She was the Sarpanch. She accompanied the police to the place of occurrence. She found the dead body lying in the middle of the room. She
also found the daughter of the victim sleeping there. She knew Mahadev
Biswas. His wife came to Havelock two and half months prior to her death.
They were residents of mainland earlier. The couple approached her one
month prior to the incident. The victim told her, she wanted to go back
to mainland with her husband whereas the husband was not willing. The
relationship between them was not very cordial. She also deposed, some
froth was coming out from her mouth. During cross examination, she
admitted not having any documentary evidence to the issue of approach by
couple mentioned by her earlier. She also admitted, she did not make any
complain with local police station with regard thereto. She denied the
suggestion, the victim did not disclose that she had insisted her husband
to go back to mainland.
PW -3 Shri. Ranjan Samadar
(3.) THE witness was the Pradhan. He got the phone call from police station. He visited the spot and found the dead body. He witnessed the inquest and
signed the inquest report. He contacted the father of the victim. The
dead body was handed over to the brother of the accused on the next date.
He put his signature on exhibit 3/1 during handing over. Wearing apparels
of victim were seized. He identified the signature on the seizure memo.
He admitted, the couple was known to him. Their relationship was not
cordial. They visited panchayat number of times. She wanted to take her
husband to mainland but the husband refused on the ground that he had not
enough money. During cross examination, the witness admitted, he did not
have any proof of visit of the couple at the panchayat. He also admitted,
he did not make any statement to the police on the victim 's insistence to
go back to mainland along with husband. He had police case pending in the
court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate. He was the first private
individual to see the dead body. The distance between his house and the
place of occurrence was 150 meters. He denied the suggestion, he did not
visit the place of occurrence or the victim had any mark of strangulation.
PW -4 K. Asaitambi
PW -4 was a Sweeper. He assisted the doctor in postmortem. He identified
his signature on the seizure list.
PW -5 Shri M.Bhupathy Rao: -
PW -5 was a business man. He was witness to the seizure conducted by
police at the hospital.
PW -6 Shri. Swapan Majhi: -;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.