UCO BANK Vs. PRECISION ENGINEERING SYSTEMS
LAWS(CAL)-2014-3-12
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on March 06,2014

UCO BANK Appellant
VERSUS
Precision Engineering Systems Respondents

JUDGEMENT

DEBANGSU BASAK, J. - (1.) SUIT was for recovery of money lent and advanced. The plaintiff also sought a declaration that properties mentioned in Annexure 'H' to the plaint remained hypothecated to the plaintiff as security.
(2.) THE Defendant No. 2(a) filed written statement. The defendants did not appear at the hearing of the suit. The original documents of the plaintiff were lost. The plaintiff produced the partner of the Solicitor firm who was acting on behalf of the plaintiff as its Advocate on Record to prove that the documents annexed to the plaint where the true copies of the originals. Such Advocate deposed on June 14, 2011. By such deposition the Advocate established that, the documents annexed to the plaint were true copies of the original. He also established that, the original documents were lost from the custody of the Bank. The plaintiff lodged a complaint with the local Police Station.
(3.) THE second witness of the plaintiff was the Assistant Manager of the plaintiff who deposed on the merits of the claim of the plaintiff. The second witness proved the documents executed by the defendants.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.