RADHAKANTA NAYEK Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
LAWS(CAL)-2014-7-127
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on July 31,2014

Radhakanta Nayek Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF WEST BENGAL Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Despite direction, no affidavit - in -opposition has been filed by the State respondents.
(2.) The petitioner has challenged an order dated January 13/18, 2012, by which the Director of School Education, Government of West Bengal i.e. the respondent No. 3 herein regretted his inability to accede to the proposal sent by the Additional District Inspector of Schools (SE), Paschirn Medinipur i.e. the respondent No. 5 herein, as the petitioner had failed to exercise the revised option in terms of an Government Order, dated October 29, 2002.
(3.) The petitioner was an approved Assistant Teacher of Bandeuli Junior High School (the school, for short) The school was subsequently upgraded as a high school. The petitioner joined in the year 1981 and by an order, dated April 21, 1982, his appointment was approved on condition that he would have to undergo Post Graduate Basic Training (P.G.B.T) as early as possible. He completed the said course in the year 1986, i.e., within the five years from the date of his joining, which was the requirement at the time of his, joining the school. The petitioner claims that after completing the said course, he is entitled to arrear incremental benefits as a trained candidate from December 1, 1982 to February 28, 2001 in terms of a communication made by the respondent. No. 4 to the respondent No. 3 on June 30, 2004. It appears that the respondent No. 4 had informed that the arrear claim of the petitioner amounted to Rs. 64, 878/ - for the said period and the matter was referred to the respondent No. 3 for necessary action on his part.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.