JUDGEMENT
SOUMEN SEN, J. -
(1.) SINCE common questions of law and facts are involved in
both the writ petitions, the hearing of the writ petitions, by consent
of the parties, are taken up together and disposed of by this
common judgment and order.
(2.) THE petitioners, in both the writ petitions, are holding Continuous Discharge Certificate (hereinafter referred to as CDC)
in different ratings from Mercantile Marine Department, Kolkata.
The petitioners, before obtaining CDC, have undergone pre -sea
course for various ratings for the purpose of rostering them in the
roster of the Administration. They are in possession of requisite
certificates issued in their favour.
On 16th July, 2004, the Director of Shipping Services, Port Blair issued an advertisement seeking applications from eligible
candidates possessing CDC with standard of training certificate in
order to prepare a panel of crew members on board on MS vessel of
the directorate in operation in foreshore sector on contract basis
(out of roster) for short term and purely on temporary basis as and
when require in respect of the following ratings namely;
1. Seacunny/Helmsman (should possess valid Watch Keeping Certificate) 2. General Purpose (Dech and Engine) 3. Saloon (Cook) 4. Deck Utility Hand
(3.) THE advertisement specifically mentions that the selected candidates shall have no right or claim for registration and / or
enrolment of their names in the foreshore company roster of the
administration. They would be further required to execute an
agreement with the directorate before they would be actually
engaged on short term basis subject to their eligibility for the
respective rating in the form as placed in the DSS notice board.
The petitioners duly participated in the said selection process and
were found to be eligible. At the relevant point of time, the
respondent was having 12 vessels. At that point of time 72
candidates from the marine department were borrowed by the
Directorate of Shipping Services for their employment in the
foreshore sector. After completion of the interview, the respondent
authority prepared two lists namely: One selected merit list and
another selected panel list. The respondent authorities in terms of
the selected list under different ratings have given appointment for
the 12 vessels at rate of 8 crews per vessel by maintaining 140 %
ratio. According to the petitioners, the respondents were supposed
to give appointment of 144 crew men which includes 72 who have
been brought from marine department. These 144 posts, in the 12
vessels are required to be filled -up from all the ratings mentioned
above.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.