JUDGEMENT
SANJIB BANERJEE, J. -
(1.) THIS is a frivolous petition made after the
superannuation of the petitioner, claiming that the petitioner's
year of birth was 1959 and not 1953 as would be evident from an
identity card issued by the employer upon the petitioner's
appointment in the year 1980.
(2.) AN affidavit has been filed by the Eastern Coalfields Limited. The coal company has also produced the service record
card, the service register and the photo medical card alongwith an
identity card issued in favour of the petitioner. All the records
demonstrate that the petitioner's year of birth was 1953. Most of
these records bear the signature of the petitioner. It is also not
in dispute that the petitioner has received the provident fund
payment and gratuity upon his superannuation.
It is now judicially accepted that a question as to a mistaken date of birth is not ordinarily entertained in Court
unless it is filed long prior to the retirement of the concerned
employee. In the present case, the petitioner accepted the
retirement benefits and thereafter came to Court on the basis of
what appears to be an erroneous entry in an identity card
suggesting that the petitioner had been discriminated against in
the petitioner being required to retire several years prior to the
actual date of retirement.
(3.) THERE is no merit in the petition, particularly in the light of the documents presented by the Eastern Coalfields Limited.
WP No. 86 of 2014 is dismissed with costs assessed at 10 GM
to be paid to the Eastern Coalfields Limited within a week from
date.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.