RAMJEE SHAW Vs. DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOL (S.E.), HOOGHLY
LAWS(CAL)-2014-5-4
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on May 06,2014

Ramjee Shaw Appellant
VERSUS
District Inspector Of School (S.E.), Hooghly Respondents

JUDGEMENT

SAMBUDDHA CHAKRABARTI, J. - (1.) BY the present writ petition the petitioner has inter alia prayed for a writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents nos. 1 and 2 to act in terms of the notification which has been annexed to the writ petition as Annexure P -1 by placing only the departmental nominee in the newly constituted Managing Committee of the concerned school as per the list submitted by the petitioner and for other reliefs.
(2.) THE petitioner who is the Vice President of the Arya Pratinidhi Sabha as well as of the Managing Committee of Champadani Arya Vidyapith in the district of Hooghly (the school for short) is aggrieved by an order issued by the respondent no. 1. Since the said school is run by the Arya Samaj the government issued a notification by which special rules for the management of the school were framed. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent no. 1 has not been following the special rules and circulars and was going to place a person interested in education on the Managing Committee. He was also going to hold election for the office bearers which again was beyond the provisions of the special rules. According to the petitioner the respondent no. 1 is to co -opt the school committee as the Managing Committee of the school which had been sent by the petitioner as a member of the Arya Samaj and the respondent no. 1 should have approved the same by placing only the departmental nominee.
(3.) IN spite of being given opportunities the said respondents did not file any affidavit -in -opposition. However, Mr. Subhabrata Dutta, the learned advocate for the state -respondents submitted that the life of the previous Managing Committee had already expired and an administrator has been appointed who is still functioning. The authorities were under a mistaken belief that because of the pendency of the writ petition it would not be proper to take any step for constitution of the Managing Committee. Mr. Dutta further submitted that if any direction is passed by the court for the preparation of the Managing Committee the state - respondents shall discharge their responsibilities in accordance with the rules without any further delay.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.