JUDGEMENT
SHIB SADHAN SADHU, J. -
(1.) APPELLANT /Plaintiff filed the suit for declaration that the registered deed of Family Settlement being deed No.2178 dated 09.09.1987 executed by
his wife Kamalarani Devi in favour of the defendants is void, collusive,
fraudulent and procured by false impersonation and so is not binding upon
the plaintiff.
(2.) PLAINTIFF 's case is that the suit property was purchased by his wife prior to their marriage. After marriage they began to reside in the suit
property, a portion of which was occupied by a tenant. His wife had been
suffering from high blood pressure, high blood sugar and neurological
problem and she was under medical treatment. Since no issue was born out
of their wedlock, they adopted a female child named Shibani Das and they
brought her up as their own daughter. The condition of Kamalarani
deteriorated day by day and she used to stay in Kolkata under the care of
Shibani. Plaintiff used to come at weekend. Shibani used to take help of
the defendants who are the sons of the elder sister of his wife, in the
event of crisis. Ultimately plaintiff managed his posting at Kolkata and
took his wife and Shibani to his paternal house at Dumdum. From the year
1982 Kamalarani lost the senses of distinguishing right or wrong. She died on 12.07.1999.
(3.) BEING the sole legal heir of his deceased wife Kamalarani Devi, the plaintiff began to collect rent from the tenants in respect of the suit
property by issuing rent receipts. On 08.08.2005 he received Advocate 's
letter along with some annexures and came to learn that his tenant
Aravinda Pal had filed a suit against him for protection of his tenancy
right. The appellant then asked his said tenant who disclosed that one of
the respondents Sekhar Banerjee had threatened him to oust from the suit
property and to construct a multi -storied building thereon. The appellant
then rushed to the house of the respondents. Being asked one of the
respondents disclosed that they had acquired right, title and interest in
the suit property by virtue of the impugned deed dated 09.09.1987 and
that they would not allow him entry into the suit property. The appellant
thereafter, took out the certified copy of the impugned deed No.2178
dated 09.08.1987 and filed the suit alleging that his wife was not
physically or mentally fit, that she had no reason to execute such deed
nor she could understand the contents or sign it and the defendants have
procured the deed by false impersonation.
The defendants contested the suit by filing a Written Statement in which the allegations brought by the plaintiff were denied. It was
contended further that Kamalarani after acquiring the suit property made
construction therein by taking money from Mani Mohan Banerjee, father of
the defendant, whom she used to treat as her son. She incurred huge
expenditure but she could not repay such amount. After marriage she
repeatedly asked the plaintiff to pay that sum of money which was
received by her for constructing the residential unit in the suit
property but he did not make any payment. So, she made up her mind to
transfer such property in favour of Mani Mohan Banerjee or his sons. She
used to reside in the suit property but the plaintiff did not maintain
her. So, she inducted some tenants in the suit property and realized rent
from the tenants and maintained herself. Also Mani Mohan and his sons
used to pay some money to her. So, she had decided to execute a deed of
private trust in favour of the defendants. Kamalarani was not suffering
from various ailments from the beginning of her married life. 2/3 years
prior to her death on 12.07.1999 she had been suffering from blood sugar
and blood pressure but she had no neurological problem. The plaintiff did
not take her to any Doctor for treatment. As per the instruction of
Kamalarani, Tushar Kanti Ghosh prepared the draft of the deed of Family
Settlement and stamp paper was purchased and the deed was executed on
09.09.1987 in which Kalipadababu was the identifier of Kamalarani and Amal Kumar Mitra and Tanima Sengupta were the witnesses. The said deed
was executed for establishment of Shiva Temple in some portion of the
suit property at the cost of beneficiary and the maintenance and the
management of the Shiva Temple would be made from the deposited amount of
Kamalarani.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.