JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) All these three applications are
interconnected and, therefore, have been taken up for hearing together to avoid the prolixity of repetition. These applications are taken out in a
Company Petition No. 611 of 1988 filed under Sections 397 and 398 of
the Companies Act, 1956 alleging the oppression and mismanagement by
the then majority shareholders.
(2.) The facts leading to the present litigations are enumerated herein
below:
One Benoy Krishna Mitra, since deceased, was a resident of
Muzaffarpur in the State of Bihar and migrated to Calcutta in the year
1946 after disposing of his various landed properties and other assets
which he possessed at the previous place of his abode. The said Benoy
Krishna Mitra as Managing Director incorporated the respondent no.1
Company i.e. India Steam Laundry Pvt. Ltd on December 3, 1948. The
said Company was primarily a Family Company as the shares were held
by the members of the family and their relatives. The said deceased was
managing the said Company along with his three sons namely Prasanta
Kumar Mitra, Tarun Kumar Mitra and Prabhat Kumar Mitra who were
assisting the said Managing Director in managing and running the said
Company. Till his death i.e January 31, 1974, the said Benoy Krishna
Mitra was holding the post of a Chairman and Managing Director of the
said Company. Upon the death of the Benoy Krishna Mitra, his eldest son Tarun Kumar Mitra was appointed as a Managing Director and
continued as such till his death i.e. April 27, 2011.
(3.) In the year 1973, it was decided to take a financial assistance to
augment the income of the Company to pledge the certain quantity of
shares to RIBI now renamed as IIBI, the respondent no.9 herein, with
clear stipulation that the said financial Company shall have a
representation in a Board of Directors. It further appears that 7,100 fully
paid up equity shares of the face value of Rs.10/- of the Company was
pledged with the IIBI for securing the said financial assistance. Since, the
respondent no.2 and 3 who were in the helm of the affairs of the
company were indulged in various acts of mismanagement and
oppression, a Company Petition being C.P. No. 611 of 1988 was filed
under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act for seeking a various
reliefs as contemplated therein. In an interlocutory application filed
therein, an order was passed on September 29, 1988 appointing two
practicing advocates if this Court as Special Officers for making
inventory of all the statutory books of accounts and assets lying at the
registered and Branch Office of the said Company. The matter was kept
pending till the year 2005, when another interlocutory application being
C.A. 707 of 2005 was taken out by the petitioners, interalia, praying for
an order of injunction restraining the respondent nos. 2 and 3 from
alienating, mortgaging, letting out or otherwise transferring the assets of the Company and also from participating with the management and
affairs of the company and/or dissipating the funds and assets thereof.
On November 23, 2005, an order was passed in the said application in
terms of prayer (k) to the judges summon which reads thus:
"(k) An order of injunction be passed restraining the respondent
no.2 & 3 and the Board of Directors of the respondent company
from letting out or creating any encumbrances relating to the
movable and immovable properties of the company situated at 80,
Jawpur Road, Kolkata 700 074 with a direction on the respondent
No.2 to furnish a list of persons to whom the factory sheds have
been let out and the rent received therefrom and also a list of the
shop-rooms of the respondent company which have been
surrendered by the respondent no. 2."
;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.