JUDGEMENT
ASHIM KUMAR BANERJEE, J. -
(1.) This is an. application made under
Section 8 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by the
sole defendant.
(2.) On an invitation of a tender made by the defendant ihe plaintiff
submitted its tender on February 17. 1997. After Ihe tender was opened
on March 15, 1997 parlies entered into negotiations. Ultimately, by a
Fax dated 28/29th March. 1997 the plaintiff withdrew its offer and
expressed their inability to negotiate any further as would appear from
page 30 of the Affidavit-in-opposition. After the offer was withdrawn the
defendant by their telefax dated March 31, 1997 confirmed the original
offer of the plaintiff and sent the purchase order for their signature and
return. The purchase order stipulates an arbitration clause. The said
purchase order also stipulates the following :
"CONFIRMATION : The duplicate copy of the Purchase Order should
be returned to us. duly signed by you, failing which the bills will
not be passed by us in time.
Purchase order and the terms and conditions forming part therein
should be accepted into Qualified acceptance and acceptances under
assumptions, presumptions and imaginary circumstances will not
be accepted by us. The Purchase Order communicated io the
supplier and retransmitted to and received by the Company,
unconditionally without any counter proposal alone shall become
legally operative and effective."
(3.) As the plaintiff had already withdrawn its offer they did not return
the Purchase Order duly confirmed by them. The plaintiff had three other
transactions with the defendant wherein admitted sums were due and
payable. The defendant stopped making payment in respect of three other
Purchase Orders in view of the plaintiffs reluctance to comply with 4th
Purchase Order. Hence the suit.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.