JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Nobody appears in spite of service of notice. The affidavit-of-service must
be filed in course of this day by the learned Advocate for the petitioner. It also
appears from record that one learned Advocate entered appearance on behalf
of the opposite party. As there is no appearance on behalf of the opposite party
today at the time of hearing of this application, I have heard the submission of
the learned Advocate for the petitioner.
(2.) The opposite party/husband filed a suit for divorce being Matrimonial
Suit No. 8 of 1998 against the present petitioner and the said suit was decreed
ex parte on 29th July, 1998. The petitioner thereafter on 28th January, 1999
filed an application for setting aside the ex parte decree alongwith a separate
application for condonation of delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act.
(3.) The learned Court below took up the said petition for condonation of
delay and petition for setting aside ex parte decree for disposal and on
examination of evidence of the parties, the learned Court has rejected the said
applications by the order impugned in this application.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.