JUDGEMENT
Arun Kumar Bhattacharya, J. -
(1.) The hearing stems from twin appeals
preferred against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by
the ld. Sessions Judge, Howrah in Sessions Trial Case No. II (10)87 on 30.01.1999.
(2.) A thumbnail sketch of the prosecution case is that on 22.06.1997 in the
evening the defacto complainant after witnessing a video show in the house of
Balaram Mal of the locality returned to house with her daughter Sumita Santra
who works in a rope factory. At night while the said Sumita was taking meal,
on being informed by her uncle Sukumar @ Habu that Raju Khamaru, with
whom she had a love affair, was calling her, she on stopping of taking meal
went away with Raju being accompanied by accused Simon, Chandi & Bablu
which was noticed by the complainant's sister Sasthi Santra. She did not
return house even after 10.00 p.m. On 23.06.1997 the defacto complainant's
near relatives searched for her from the morning. At about 9.30 a.m. on being
informed by a few local persons viz Sukumar Santra, Bhutta Santra, Prabir
Santra & Nemai Santra that the deadbody of her daughter was floating in the
pond at Dangar Math, the defacto complainant went there, found the dead-
body of Sumita floating in the water-hyacinth and after coming back she
informed the matter to the police through a Panchayat member Sailen Mondal.
Accused Raju threatened to marry Sumita without delay when the complainant
told that she was too young, for which Raju's friends Simon, Bablu & Chandi
threatened to kill Sumita if she was not given in marriage. So, Raju and his
said friends killed her and threw her deadbody in the pond. Hence, all the four
accused persons viz Raju Khamaru, Bablu Pramanick, Chandi Charan Das &
Srimanta Dhara were charged under sections 302/34, 201/34 & 376 IPC.
(3.) The defence case, as suggested to P.Ws. and as contended by the accused
persons during their examination under section 313 Cr. PC., is that no such
incident took place. The victim Sumita @ Buri had a love affair with Bhola &
Laltu. Neither accused Raju had any talk with Buri nor he called her away on
that night to Dongaghata Field nor other three accused persons accompanied
them nor they committed murder of Sumita @ Buri and threw her deadbody in
the pond. They have been falsely implicated in this case.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.