JUDGEMENT
Pranab Kumar Deb, J. -
(1.) This instant appeal has been directed against the
conviction and sentence passed by the learned Judge, Special Court, under the
N.D.P.S. Act, 6th Court, Barasat in connection with the Case being No. 79 of
2000.
(2.) The incident leading to the institution of the case took place on 7.9.2000.
On that date round about 12.10 hrs. the then I.C. of Barasat P.S. received an
information over the phone that a person called Punjabi Mondal was selling
heroin at Jagdighata, Kajipara. The matter was reported to S.D.O. & S.D.P.O.,
Barasat. Acting on the tip-off and the information so received over the phone,
I.C., Barasat headed for the place of occurrence with some other police personnel.
They reached Jagdighata, Kajipara within half an hour. There they found a tall
person selling articles to another one. Seeing the police personnel approaching,
the person purchasing the article took to his heeds, However, the person selling
the articles was cornered by the police personnel. He was found in possession of
some materials. Having been convinced that the person so detained had been
dealing in heroin, the police personnel apprised him of his right to be searched in
presence of a Magistrate. The offer so made by the police personnel was accepted
by him. Accordingly, I. C., Barasat P.S. sent a requisition to the S.D.O. with a
request to depute a Magistrate for the purpose of conducting the search in his
presence. Under the direction of the S.D.O., Barasat, Sri Sanjib Chatterjee, B.D.O.
came to the spot to oversee the search. The accused disclosed his identity in
presence of Sri Sanjib Chatterjee. The accused was given the option to have the
police personnel searched by the local witnesses. Save and except the wearing
apparels, nothing was found in their possession. Thereafter the search of the
accused was conducted. On search, a polythene paper covering a carry pack
containing some amount of stickly substance of snuff colour could be recovered
from the possession of the accused. A goldsmith was called to weigh the
incriminating heroin. It was at that stage the seizure was effected in presence of
independent local witnesses and the B.D.O. The sealed container containing the
heroin was sent to the Chemical Analyst for his examination and report. On
receipt of the report of the Chemical Analyst and after examination of the
witnesses, the I.O. submitted chargesheet against the accused.
(3.) On perusal of the materials on record, the learned Special Judge was
pleased to frame charge under section 21/27 of the N.D.P.S. Act. The accused,
however, pleaded not guilty to the accusation levelled against him. Accordingly,
the trial commenced against him. As many as twelve witnesses including the
informant, the Chemical Analyst, the Investigating Officer and the B.D.O., in
whose presence such search was conducted, were examined.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.