JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This Appeal has been preferred challenging the Order of Remand
being Order No. 42 dated 22.8.1991 passed by the learned Illrd Court of
Assistant Judge, Howrah in T.A. No. 119 of 86, setting aside the judgment and
decree passed by the learned Munsif in T.S. No.105 of 85.
(2.) The plaintiff made out a case in the plaint that the plaintiff is the
owner of the Premises No. 24, Debendra Ganguly Road, P.S.-Shibpur and the
defendant was a licencee under plaintiff with regard to a tea stall on the
southern verandah particulars of which is described in the schedule to the
plaint. Originally the defendant was a licencee under the plaintiff. At the time
of talk of purchase the suit property, this defendant allegedly assured the
plaintiff to remove the business from the suit stall. According to the plaintiff-
she purchased the suit holding on 27.5.1981 and on the request of the
defendant the plaintiff allowed the defendant two months time i.e. to remain
there as a licencee for two months.
(3.) According to the plaintiff, the defendant did not vacate the suit
premises within these two months inspite of repeated requests. The plaintiff
thereafter sent notice by Registered Post with Acknowledgment Due directing
the defendant to quit and vacate the suit property i.e. the tea stall within 15
days from the receipt thereof. But nothing developed and accordingly plaintiff
filed this suit.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.