SEA STREAM NAVIGATION LTD. Vs. LMJ INTERNATIONAL LTD.
LAWS(CAL)-2013-2-139
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on February 05,2013

Sea Stream Navigation Ltd. Appellant
VERSUS
LMJ INTERNATIONAL LTD. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

I.P.Mukerji, J. - (1.) BACKGROUND:
(2.) A controversy in this case arises out of a foreign award. The petitioner award holder is a company registered in Malta. It owns vessels and lets them out. One of such vessels was "M.V. GALINA -II". On or about 21st January, 2000, the Respondent judgment debtor entered into a charterparty agreement with them. They hired the above vessel to carry soyabean meal in bags from the port of Kandla in India to a safe port in Libya. The Charterparty was in Gencon form. It contained an arbitration clause. A dispute arose about demurrage payable by the charterer to the owner, as is usual in such agreements. On 8th August, 2000, Mr. Patrick O'Donovan was appointed as the Arbitrator. By a letter dated 9th February, 2001, the learned arbitrator forwarded a copy of the award to the parties. The award was made on 17th January, 2001. Under the Award the charterer had to pay to the owner a sum of US $ 42, 890.86 together with interest on the said sum @ 8.50% per annum or prorata compounded at quarterly rests from 5th April, 2000 until the date of the award and thereafter, @ 8.25% per annum or prorata compounded on the same basis until the date of payment. A provision was made in the award to make a subsequent award of taxed costs after the learned arbitrator held that the Charterer would bear their own as well as the owner's costs. However, costs towards the final award were assessed at sterling 1590 payable by the charterer, together with interest @ 8% per annum or prorata compounded at quarterly rests if the costs had been paid by the owner, until the date of reimbursement.
(3.) THE owners put the above foreign award into execution in our country. They filed an execution application in this Court. It was numbered as EC No. 28 of 2003. The charterer resisted the award. They, inter alia, said that it was un -executable. The execution application became contested.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.