JUDGEMENT
ASHIM KUMAR BANERJEE,J. -
(1.) PREFACE :
Indian freedom struggle passed through violent and non-violent movement
from time to time. We do not wish to enter into a debate, who should be
given the credit for our freedom, the non-violent movement under the
leadership of the father of the nation or the violent one. If people
would like to give credit to the non-violent movement they would have
sound logic behind it. Yet, no one could ignore the relentless fight of
the youths of India to put the British administration in difficulty many
a times through violent movement, rather it was a fall out of continuous
oppression and torture that the British administration inflicted on our
predecessor. Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose was one of the pioneers of our
non-violent movement and ardent follower of the father of the nation.
However, in 1939 he left the Congress and organized the Indian youth to
fight out the British administration. The Second World War helped him in
this regard when he joined the opposing force of British with his
disciplined force commonly known as 'INA '. He left the country and went
underground and fought the British from outside. We ultimately got
freedom in 1947. Sixty-six years have passed thereafter. We feel ashamed,
we do not know his whereabouts. By the long passage of time, any prudent
man would agree, he is no more in this world. How did he die? What did he
do since we last heard him on the Radio? Being the citizen of the world 's
largest democracy, each one of us has a birth right to ask the Government
to let us know about him and how he died. Three Commissions could not
answer the query, was the Government sincere? or despite their best
efforts and sincerity they could not find out the cause. With this
mindset, we proceed to dispose of the present litigation pertaining to
our great Hero.
BACKDROP :
(2.) AFTER the India became independent the democratic Government of the country appointed a Commission called 'Shah Nawaz Committee ' in April
1956 to find out the whereabouts of Netaji. The 'Shah Nawaz Committee ' could not effectively answer the reference. The Government again
appointed 'Khosla Commission of enquiry ' in 1970 to enquire into and
report to the Government on the circumstances concerning the departure of
Netaji from Bangkok on or about August 18, 1945 and reported death in the
plane crash and the subsequent development thereto. The second Commission
also failed to answer the reference. The Government did not proceed any
further. This caused annoyance to the members of public.
On January 22, 1992 the President of India decided to award Bharat Ratna to Netaji posthumously that created a tremendous discontent amongst the
members of the public as the Government took Netaji to be dead. Sri Bijon
Ghosh, an advocate of this Court filed a Public Interest Litigation that
ultimately reached the Apex Court. The Apex Court however recorded the
concession of the Central Government who ultimately dropped the idea of
giving the posthumous award to Netaji. The Apex Court recorded, "since no
further steps have been taken pursuant to the press communique and the
matter is treated as closed, we declare that the press communique should
be treated as cancelled ". The Government had to backtrack and withdraw
the notification. Subsequently, another Advocate of this Court Mr.
Rudrajyoti Bhattacharjee along with another, filed Public Interest
Litigation being WP No. 281 of 1998 inter alia praying for various
directions on the alleged research being conducted by Netaji Research
Bureau and for classification and disclosure of all documents relating to
Netaji as also his nexus in the Second World War. The Division Bench of
our Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondent
administration to launch a vigorous enquiry in accordance with law by
appointing a Commission of Enquiry to find out whether he was dead or
alive, and in case, he was dead, the cause of death as also to find out,
whether the ashes that was kept at Renkoji Temple at Japan would belong
to Netaji or not. The administration accepted the said order and
appointed one-man enquiry Commission under the aegis of Monoj Kumar
Mukherjee, a former Judge of the Apex Court to answer the following
questions:
(a) Whether Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose is dead or alive; (b) If he is dead, whether he died in the plane crash, as alleged; (c) Whether the ashes in the Japanese Temple are ashes of Netaji; (d) Whether he has died in any other manner at any other place and, if so, when and how; (e) If he is alive, in respect of his whereabouts.
(3.) THE Commission submitted its report on November 8, 2005. The detailed report in three volumes answered as follows :
(a) Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose is dead; (b) He did not die in the plane crash, as alleged; (c) The ashes in the Japanese Temple are not of Netaji; (d) In absence of any clinching evidence a positive answer cannot be given; and (f) Answer already given in (a) above. ;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.