ROBIN ROY CHOWDHURY Vs. ANIL MUKHERJEE
LAWS(CAL)-2013-9-14
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on September 09,2013

Robin Roy Chowdhury Appellant
VERSUS
Anil Mukherjee Respondents

JUDGEMENT

ASIM KUMAR MONDAL,J. - (1.) THIS is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
(2.) THE petitioner is defendant in a suit being No. Title Suit ­ 87 of 2008 which is pending before the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rd Court, BuRdwan. 3. The opposite party is the plaintiff. A suit has been instituted at the instance of opposite party for recovery of khas possession upon evicting the defendant petitioner.
(3.) THE petitioner after having entered appearance and filed application under Section 7(i) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 along with a petition under Section 7(ii) of West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act and for permission to deposit monthly current rent as well as for determination of the relationship of the landlord and tenant between the parties. The petitioner in her written statement has denied the right, title and interest of the plaintiff in the suit property as landlord. It is the positive case of the petitioner that he is the tenant under one Amarnath Mukherjee and plaintiff who claimed to have purchased the said property could not establish his ownership in respect of the said property.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.