JUDGEMENT
PRASENJIT MANDAL, J. -
(1.) CHALLENGE is to the Order dated
December 17, 2012 passed by the learned Additional
District Jude, Special Court, Asansol in Misc. Case No.12
of 2010 arising out of the Matrimonial Suit No.66 of 2010
thereby disposing of an application under Section 24 of
the Hindu Marriage Act.
(2.) THE husband/petitioner herein instituted the aforesaid suit for dissolution of marriage under Sections
13(1)(ia) and 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the learned District Judge, Alipore and in that
suit, the wife is contesting. She filed an application
under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act which was
disposed of by the impugned order directing the husband
to pay alimony pendente lite at the rate of Rs.6,000/-
per month from the date of filing of the case and a sum
of Rs.20,000/- as litigation costs. Being aggrieved, the
husband has preferred this application.
Now, the question is whether the impugned order should be sustained.
(3.) HAVING heard the learned Counsel for the parties and on going through the materials on record, I find that the
parties have adduced evidence in support of their
respective contentions in respect of the application
under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. According to
the materials on record, the marriage between the parties
according to Hindu rights and customs is an admitted
fact.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.