JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Since common questions of law and facts arise in
both the writ applications they were heard together and dispose of by
this common judgment.
(2.) The petitioners claimed to have acquired several plots of land by 22
several conveyance deeds, which are adjoining each other, all situated in
Mouza Madurdaha in Borough No.XII of the Kolkata Municipal
Corporation. Each of the previous owners has separate assessee
numbers for their respective plots of land and bills are raised by the KMC
in their names. After transfer of their respective plots, the previous
owners along with the petitioners gave notices of transfer in the requisite
form to the KMC. After the applications for mutation were made by the
said petitioners, the respondent authorities informed the said petitioners
that there are outstanding tax dues payable by the previous owners
against their separate assessment and it was represented that unless the
petitioners cleared the outstanding taxes, mutation applications filed by
the petitioner for mutating their names could not be affected. On the
basis of the said representation, the petitioners have cleared the
outstanding dues. In spite of the aforesaid, the Kolkata Municipal
Corporation has failed and neglected to mutate the names of the said
petitioners. It is with this grievance, the petitioners filed this writ
application.
(3.) The Corporation appears to have refused such mutation on the
ground that the State of West Bengal had requisitioned vast plot of land
including the entire land of Mouza Madurdaha for the promotion of the
Fishery business and allied activities. The Fisheries Department,
however, did not give any No-Objection Certificate to the petitioners and
so long as the requisition subsists the name of the petitioners cannot be
mutated. It was contended that No Objection Certificate from the
Fisheries Department is essential to effect mutation.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.