JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) : Challenge is to the Order dated May
30, 2013 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior
Division), 5th Court, Howrah in Title Suit No.118 of 2006
thereby rejecting an application for amendment of the
plaint.
(2.) The plaintiff/petitioner herein instituted the
aforesaid suit for permanent injunction and damages
praying for a decree of permanent injunction restraining
the defendant from transferring or encumbering or making
over possession of the suit property to anybody else in
any manner whatsoever and other consequential reliefs. During the pendency of the suit, the plaintiff filed
the said application for amendment of the plaint
incorporating the relief of specific performance of
contract directing the substituted defendants to execute
and register the deed of conveyance in terms of the deed
of agreement dated March 15, 2003 and subsequent extended
deed dated March 20, 2005 in favour of the plaintiff in
respect of the suit property with delivery of possession
thereof. That application was rejected by the impugned
order. Being aggrieved, the plaintiff/petitioner herein
has preferred this application.
(3.) Now, the question is whether the learned Trial Judge
is justified in rejecting the prayer for amendment of the
plaint.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.