JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The present petitioner has been charge sheeted
under section 376(2)(f) IPC and under section 4 of the
Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, before the
learned A.C.J.M., Haldia took a plea that at the time of the
alleged occurrence he was below the age of 18 years, therefore, a juvenile and his case be placed before the
concerned Juvenile Justice Board for necessary action in
terms of Juvenile Justices (Care and Protection of
Children) Act, 2006.
(2.) It appears on such plea the learned Magistrate called
for a report from the investigating officer of the case as
regards to the plea taken by the petitioner. When the
investigating officer of the case obtained a certificate from
the headmaster of the school where the petitioner took
admission in class-I on May 4, 2011. In the said certificate
the petitioner's date of birth was mentioned as March 23,
1996. At the same time the investigating officer of the case
also seized the admission register of the school. However,
in the admission register of the school, the column where
the date of birth of the petitioner was noted was found to
be interpolated and overwritten. Accordingly, the learned Magistrate refused to act thereupon and directed for his
ossification test.
(3.) Aggrieved by such order for ossification test of the
petitioner for the determination of his age, this criminal
revision has now moved before me.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.