JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Admittedly, the private respondents were the owners of the land in question. The said land of the
private respondents stood vested with the State. The said order of vesting passed by the concerned BL &
LRO was ultimately quashed by an order passed by the West Bengal Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal
on 3rd March 2003 in O.A No. 2655 of 2001. The concerned BL & LRO was directed to correct the record of
rights accordingly. Pursuant to the order passed by the Tribunal, a proceeding was initiated by the
concerned BL & LRO for divesting the said land of the private respondents. Ultimately, the land previously
vested with this State was divested vide order dated 20th October, 2008 passed by the concerned BL&LRO in
Misc. case No. 01 of 2003. The record of rights was corrected accordingly. Subsequently, the pattas which
were granted in favour of several landless persons were annulled. But since those patta holders are still in
possession over the land in question, proceeding has been initiated for recovery of possession from the patta
holders by the concerned Sub-Divisional Officer.
(2.) The petitioner herein claims that they being the landless persons are in possession of the said land in
question. They further allege that though they are in possession of the land in question, no notice relating to
any proceeding such as divesting of the vested land and/or correction of record of rights was ever served
upon them and thus, the order of divesting and/or correction of record of rights was made by the concerned
authority by keeping them in dark about those proceedings and they were not given any opportunity of
hearing in connection with those proceedings at any stage thereof.
(3.) It is alleged that since the possessory right of the petitioners is now under threat and such threat
originated for the first time from the order passed by the Tribunal which is impugned in this writ petition
before this court, they have filed the instant writ petition challenging the order passed by the Tribunal on
12th June, 2013 in O.A case No. 1177 of 2012(LRTT) by which the Sub-Divisional Officer Rampurhat, District
Birbhum was directed to consider and dispose of the grievances of the private respondents by treating the
original application along with annexures filed by the private respondents before the Tribunal as their
representation, within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, by giving fair and reasonable
opportunity of hearing to the private respondents and other interested persons and by passing a reasoned
order.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.