JUDGEMENT
SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, J. -
(1.) ALTHOUGH the matter is appearing under the heading 'for orders', by consent
of the learned advocates appearing for the parties, we take up the hearing of the
appeal. All formalities are dispensed with.
(2.) WE have considered the submissions of Mr. Aswini Kumar Bera, learned advocate appearing for the appellant and Mr. Golam Mostaffa, learned advocate
appearing for the applicants in the application for succession certificate in the
trial court, that is, the respondent nos.1, 2, 3 and 4 in this appeal.
Respondent nos.5 to 8, in spite of service of notice of this appeal, remain unrepresented.
(3.) ONE Jagadananda Ghara had certain deposits with Maratala Post Office. The applicants in the application of succession certificate contended that
Jagadananda Ghara died intestate on November 29, 2004 leaving behind him his
three sons and two daughters. His wife had predeceased him. Therefore, his
sons and daughters would inherit one-fifth share each in the debts and securities
left by the said Jagadananda Ghara.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.