JUDGEMENT
PRASENJIT MANDAL, J. -
(1.) THIS application is at the instance of an
Ex-Assistant Librarian of the Central Library of the University of
Calcutta and is filed for raising the question as to whether a
subsequent appointment under a similar educational institution
upon resignation with proper permission entails forfeiture of past
service.
(2.) THE short fact necessary for the purpose of this application is that on July 15, 1965, the petitioner joined respondent
Calcutta University as Library Assistant, and, thereafter, he was
appointed Assistant Librarian of the Central Library of the
Calcutta University on September 8, 1983. The petitioner joined
the University of Jadavpur as Lecturer on April 6, 1984 upon
tendering resignation of his previous assignment. Thereafter, the
petitioner joined the post of Chief Librarian, Jadavpur University
on July 2, 1992 and retired from service as Chief Librarian on
April 30, 2000. Then on April 27, 2001, the petitioner exercised
option in terms of the Memorandum dated January 31, 2000 and the
same was accepted with an undertaking for suitable adjustment.
Then in 2005, he filed a representation for entitlement of his
dues and his representation remained unattended and so, this
application has been preferred.
Upon hearing the learned Counsel for the parties and on going through the materials on record, I find that admittedly, the
petitioner joined the University of Calcutta as Library Assistant
on July 15, 1965 and then he applied to the post of Lecturer in
Jadavpur University. On being selected, he tendered resignation
accordingly, which was accepted w.e.f. April 6, 1984 and then he
joined his new assignment on April 6, 1984. It is not in dispute
that the petitioner applied to the said post of Lecturer of the
Jaduvpur University through the proper channel, but when he was
selected, he tendered his resignation and accordingly, the
terminal benefits available to him were paid to him.
(3.) MR . Asish Kumar Sanyal, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner, has contended that the petitioner applied to the said
post of Lecturer of the Jaduvpur University through the proper
channel and as such, there was a lien and he submitted his
resignation to join the new assignment as Lecturer. So, the
petitioner is entitled to get the consideration of the length of
the service rendered by him in the University of Calcutta and as
such, his pension and other retiral benefits are to be re-fixed.
He is entitled to make a representation as per Memorandum dated
January 31, 2000 appearing as Annexure P-3 at page no.32. The
petitioner was deprived of such benefits and that is why this writ
application has been preferred. So, appropriate reliefs may be
granted in favour of the petitioner.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.