JUDGEMENT
PRASENJIT MANDAL, J. -
(1.) THESE two applications are directed against the Order no.9 dated June 18, 2013 passed by the
learned Additional District Judge, 2nd Court, Barrackpore
in Matrimonial Suit No.1314 of 2012 thereby allowing in
part an application under Section 24 of the Hindu
Marriage Act, 1955.
(2.) THE husband/petitioner herein of the C.O. No.2676 of 2013 instituted the aforesaid suit for dissolution of marriage under Section 13 (1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage
Act, 1955. The wife/opposite party herein of the C.O.
No.2676 of 2013 is contesting the said matrimonial suit
by filing a written statement claiming a counter-claim
for restitution of the conjugal rights in the aforesaid
suit. She filed an application under Section 24 of the
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 praying for alimony at the rate
of Rs.35,000/- per month and the litigation costs of
Rs.4,000/- per month.
Upon due consideration of the materials on record, the learned Trial Judge granted the alimony pendente lite
at the rate of Rs.20,000/- per month in favour of the
wife from the date of the order. But, the prayer for
litigation costs has been rejected. Being aggrieved by
such order, the wife has preferred the Civil Revision
No.2754 of 2013 for enhancement of the alimony and grant
of litigation costs.
(3.) ON the other hand, the husband has filed the C.O. No.2676 of 2013 for granting a lesser amount of alimony
pendente lite. Since both the applications have been
preferred against the same and one order, they are
disposed of by this common judgment and order.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.