JUDGEMENT
Joytosh Banerjee, J. -
(1.) The instant appeal is directed against the judgment
dated 18.5.2002 passed by the Judge, M.A.C.T., 2nd Court, Bankura in a
proceeding under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act registered as Motor
Accident Claim Case No. 26/99 / 157/97
(2.) The claimant/petitioners Bidur Banerjee and two of his minor children
made the application on 20.11.97 praying for compensation to the extent of Rs.
5 lacs on the allegation that on 9.11.96 at about 1 p.m. Hansi Chatterjee
(Banerjee), the deceased, the wife of the petitioner Bidur and mother of the
other petitioners was proceeding on foot towards Bishnupur through
Radhanagar. From Bishnupur side suddenly a truck No. WBI-7191 came at an
excessive speed and the victim was run over by such vehicle causing severe
injuries on her vital parts of the body. After the accident, the victim was referred
to Bishunupur Sub-Divisional Hospital where she succumbed to her injuries at
about 2 p.m. on the same day. The petitioners have filed the application on the
specific allegation that the accident took place due to rash and negligent driving
of the offending vehicle, on a further allegation that the victim at the time of
her death was aged about 46 years and she was Health Supervisor attached to
Radhanagar Primary Health Centre. Due to the unfortunate death of the victim
the two minor petitioners who were aged 9 years and 6 years respectively at
the time of such accident lost their mother at their tender age. The petitioners
also claimed the compensation for mental agony, financial loss etc.
(3.) In this proceeding there were 3 O.Ps including the Insurance Company.
The Insurance Company (Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.) in their written objection
clearly stated that they were not liable to pay compensation to the petitioners
because the offending vehicle was not insured with the O.P./Insurance Company
on the date of accident that is to say on 9.11.96 and such offending vehicle was
insured upto 7.11.96. Amongst two alleged owners, O.P. No. 2, the Managing
Director of M/s. Cadila Leasing and Finance Co. Ltd. alleged that the Company
was not liable to give any compensation because the offending vehicle had
already been sold to Rampukar Show on 12.12.88 and the authority concerned
was duly intimated about such transfer. The O.P./Company, further disclosed
in the written objection that the name of the Company had already been changed
to M/s. Glitter Leasing and Finance Company (P) Ltd. O.P. Rampukar Show in
his written objection stated that he was not a registered owner of the said
vehicle on the date of accident that is to say on 9.11.96 but the said Cadila
Leasing and Finance Company continued as the registered owner of the vehicle
and also took the plea that the accident caused due to negligence on the part of
the victim Hansi Banerjee.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.