SRI GOUTAM SENGUPTA Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
LAWS(CAL)-2012-3-126
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on March 29,2012

Sri Goutam Sengupta Appellant
VERSUS
Union of India And Ors. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Jayanta Kumar Biswas, J: - (1.) THE petitioner in this WP under art. 226 dated February 7, 2006 is seeking the following relief: - a) A writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to act in accordance with law and to grant interest in accordance with law on the refunded amount of Rs. 37117/ - as per Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. As an individual assessee the petitioner submitted his tax return under the Income -tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 1996 -97 (Financial Year 1995 -96). He claimed deduction under s. 80RRA of the Act for Rs. 86,575. The Assessing Officer processed the return disallowing the claim on the grounds that he failed to submit the original approval certificate of the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue (FT & TR Division), New Delhi.
(2.) THE petitioner submitted application contending that the Assessing Officer was wrong in disallowing the deduction claimed by him. Entertaining the application the Assessing Officer took up the matter for consideration under s.154 of the Act, and finally passed an order dated September 13, 2002 (at p.32) accepting the petitioner's contention and directing refund of Rs. 37,117. This refundable amount was paid by a cheque dated March 27, 2003. Interest on the refundable amount at the statutory rate under s. 244A was paid for the period from September 13, 2002 to March 27, 2003. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner made representations claiming interest on the refundable amount for the period from April 1, 1996 to September 12, 2002. The Assessing Officer held that delay in refund was for reasons wholly and exclusively attributable to the petitioner in that he submitted the relevant documents only on August 30, 2002. The decision was made known by a letter dated October 31, 2003 (at p.43). Feeling aggrieved the petitioner has brought this WP.
(3.) THE Income -tax Officer concerned was requested to appear and give assistance to this Court, because advocate for the respondents was unable to say whether the proviso to sub -s.(1) of s. 80RRA was applicable to the case. The proviso was inserted by the Finance Act, 1996 with effect from April 1, 1997. The proviso is that no deduction under sub -s.(1) of s. 80RRA shall be allowed unless the assessee furnishes a certificate, in the prescribed form, with the return of income, certifying that the deduction has been correctly claimed in accordance with s. 80RRA.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.