JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This application is for quashing the
proceeding of Complaint Case No.833 of 2011 under Sections 342/344
of the Indian Penal Code pending before the learned Judicial
Magistrate, 2nd Court, Barasat.
(2.) The short fact is that the elder brother of the petitioner
was married to the opposite party No.2 on January 29, 2001
according to Hindu Customs and Rites and one daughter, namely,
Tanish Saha was born in the wedlock. There is no good
relationship between the husband and wife and as such, dispute
arose between the two. The guardians of the parties tried to
solve the dispute in vain. As per contention of the husband, the
wife mixed with one Sambhunath Saha and the criminal case was
lodged against both of them and they, i.e., the wife and the said
Sambhunath Saha pleaded guilty to the allegation under Section 290
of the Indian Penal Code. Thereafter, the wife filed a criminal
case under Section 498A/406/323/324/34 of the Indian Penal Code
against the husband and his other relations. That case is still
pending for investigation.
(3.) The wife filed a Complaint Case also under Section 342/344 of
the Indian Penal Code against the husband and two others and in
that case, she filed an application under Section 97 of the
Criminal Procedure Code (henceforth shall be called as 'Cr.P.C. )
for recovery of her minor daughter aged about 8 and half years
(now about 10 years). That application under Section 97 of the
Cr.P.C. was allowed by the impugned order. In such circumstances,
this application has been preferred.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.