JUDGEMENT
PRASENJIT MANDAL, J. -
(1.) THIS application is at the instance of the
defendant no.s 1 & 2 and is directed against the judgment and
order dated August 2, 2007 passed by the learned Civil Judge
(Senior Division), 3
rd
Court, Alipore in Misc. Appeal No.95 of 2007
thereby affirming the judgment and order dated March 5, 2007
passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 5
th
Court,
Alipore in Title Suit No.261 of 2006. 2
(2.) THE plaintiffs / opposite parties herein instituted a suit being Title Suit No.261 of 2006 against the petitioners and other
opposite parties before the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division),
5 th
Court, Alipore for eviction on the ground of default and other
reliefs. In that suit, the opposite parties filed an application
for temporary injunction restraining the petitioners from making
construction of commercial building by the sanctioned plan. Upon
hearing both the sides, the learned Trial Judge disposed of the
application directing the parties to maintain status quo in
respect of the suit property till disposal of the suit.
The defendants preferred an appeal being Misc. Appeal No.95 of 2007 and that misc. appeal was dismissed on contest with costs
thereby affirming the order dated March 5, 2007 passed by the
learned Trial Judge. Being aggrieved, this application has been
preferred.
Now, the question is whether the impugned order should be
sustained.
(3.) UPON hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on going through the materials on record, I find that the plaintiffs have
contended that the defendants are trying to make illegal
construction by obtaining a second plan illegally. It is their
specific contention that by the first plan, there was an open
space and there was a provision for making underground water
reservoir for storing water for the purpose of fire fighting as 3
provided in the original plan. If the defendants are allowed to
raise construction, on that open space, the plaintiffs ' easement
rights would also be seriously prejudiced.
Both the Courts below have come to the concurrent findings in
this regard.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.