JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) All these three appeals are taken up for consideration analogously as all these
appeals are directed against orders dated February 27, 2011 passed by the learned
Civil Judge (Senior Division) First Court, at Barasat, district: North 24 Parganas in
Title Suit Nos. 286 of 2007, 289 of 2007 and 290 of 2007.
(2.) By consent of Mr. Sudhis Dasgupta, learned senior advocate, appearing for the
appellant in F.M.A.T. No. 379 of 2012, Mr. Bidyut Kumar Banerjee, learned senior
advocate, appearing for the appellant in F.M.A.T. Nos. 380 381 of 2012 and Mr.
Saktinath Mukherjee and Mr. Shyama Prasanna Roychowdhury, learned senior
advocates, appearing for the respondents, all these appeals are taken up for final
hearing analogously, upon dispensation of all formalities, to avoid conflicting
judicial opinions.
(3.) By the orders impugned, the learned trial judge allowed applications under
Order 39, rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by
the plaintiff-respondent and rejected the applications filed by the defendant under
Order 39, rule 4 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
These appeals arise out of suits, inter alia, for specific performance of contract
for sale.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.