JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Way back in the year 1991, to be precise on May 1991, the
plaintiffs instituted this suit against the sole defendant, Sri Kailash
Nath Dhar (the defendant, in short) claiming "a decree for declaration
that the plaintiffs are ready and willing to pay the balance
consideration money as per the agreement dated 26 March 1989 to
the defendant for the purchase of property as described . of the
plaint", "a decree for declaration that the defendant is liable to
execute proper deed of sale as per terms of the agreement dated 26
March 1989 in respect of the suit property in favour of the plaintiffs
on receipt of the balance agreed consideration money of
Rs. 3,54,000/- and give vacant possession of the suit property to the
plaintiffs", "a decree for executing and registering proper deed of sale
by the defendant in favour of the plaintiffs within the time to be
specified by the Hon'ble Court and failing which the said deed be
executed and registered according to the provisions of Order 21 Rule
34 (5) and (6) (a) of the Civil Procedure Code", "a decree for
permanent injunction restraining the defendant as men and agents
from executing any sale deed and/or part with possession in respect
of the suit premises to any other person or persons excepting the
plaintiffs or encumbering the same or in any manner whatsoever",
alternatively a decree against the defendant for a sum of
Rs. 5,23,600/- inclusive of Rs3,96,000/- being the principal amount
paid by the plaintiffs and Rs. 1,27,600/- being the interest at the rate
of 15 per cent per annum from 26 March 1989 to 26 May 1991,
further interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum till realization.
(2.) The property which the plaintiffs agreed to buy is a three storied
building at premises No. 36, Brindaban Basak Street, Kolkata 700
005 (the property, in short), the full particulars of the said property
is set out in Schedule (a) to the plaint.
(3.) The case as made out by the plaintiffs in the plaint is that the
plaintiffs intended to buy a portion of the said property at premises
No. 36, Brindaban Basak Street, Kolkata 700 005 from the
defendant who was and is the sole owner of the said property and the
defendant also intended to sell the same to the plaintiffs.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.