JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The present case arises out of an application under Section
482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973.
(2.) It is directed against the Order dated 30.4.2011 passed by the
learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, 8th Fast Track Court, Calcutta in Criminal
Appeal Case No. 13 of 2011 affirming the order dated 24.9.2010 passed by the learned
Metropolitan Magistrate, 14th Court, Calcutta in Complaint Case No. 263 of 2011 under
Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The relevant facts of the present case are, in a nutshell, as
follows:
The wife/O. P. No. 1 herein as petitioner/aggrieved person
initiated a case under Section 12 of Protection of Woman from Domestic Violence Act,
2005 against her husband and mother-in-law praying for Residence orders, Monetary
reliefs and Compensation orders as per the provisions of Sections 19, 20 and 22 of the
said Act. The said case was registered as complaint case No. 263 of 2010. In the said
complaint case, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 14th Court, Calcutta by his order
dated 24.9.2010 allowed the prayer of the wife/aggrieved person and the
husband/O. P. /petitioner herein was directed to pay a sum of Rs. 50,000/- as
compensation. He (the husband) was also directed to pay Rs. 2000/- p. m. and Rs. 1000/-
p. m. respectively as monetary relief and as rent for alternative accommodation
respectively.
(3.) Being aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner herein filed
criminal appeal under Section 29 of the said Act which was registered as Criminal Appeal
Case No. 13 of 2011. The learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, 8th Fast Track
Court, Calcutta dismissed the said appeal and affirmed the order dated 24.9.2011 passed
by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 14th Court, Calcutta in Complaint Case No. 263 of
2011.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.