JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THIS is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India against order dated September 16, 2011 passed by the Central
Administrative Tribunal, Calcutta Bench, in Original Application No.
420 of 2011.
(2.) BY order dated January 29, 2007 this writ petitioner was dismissed from service. On March 10, 2007 the writ petitioner
submitted an appeal before the appellate authority. Unfortunately,
he forgot to put his signature in the appeal.
The disciplinary authority refused to forward the appeal to the appellate authority on the ground, it was defective. When
attention of the petitioner was drawn that the appeal was defective,
he filed yet another appeal on June 4, 2007. The appellate authority
did not consider the appeal on merits and proceeded on the basis
that the application was barred by limitation as the order of dismissal
was passed on January 2007. Due to such inaction the petitioner
approached the Central Administrative Tribunal some time in the
year 2011.
(3.) AFTER hearing Mr. Tapabrata Chakraborty, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Moloy Kumar Das,
learned advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent
authorities, and considering the nature of the grievance of the
petitioner, we feel that justice will be subserved if the writ petition is
disposed of by directing the appellate authority to consider and
dispose of the appeal filed on June 4, 2007 in accordance with law
after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner or his
authorized representatives within three months. The appellate
authority is, further, directed to communicate his speaking and
reasoned order to the appellant forthwith.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.