GHOCHU RAJAK Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
LAWS(CAL)-2012-10-93
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on October 02,2012

GHOCHU RAJAK Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF WEST BENGAL Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) THE judgment of the Court was as follows: - The present case arises out of an application under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
(2.) IT is directed against the order dated 22nd July, 2011 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 2nd Court, Barrackpore, North 24-Parganas in M. Case No. 40 of 2009 rejecting the prayer of the petitioners for maintenance as per the provision of Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The relevant facts of the present case are, in a nutshell, as follows: - Petitioners herein initiated the proceeding under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against their daughter-in-law praying for their maintenance of Rs. 10,000.00 per month as they had no independent source of income and were unable to maintain themselves. It is the case of the petitioners that their elder son Sanjoy Rajak to whom they were dependent, was an employee of Eastern Railway, Kanchrapara Workshop. On 31.10.2003 the said Sanjoy Rajak died and his widow/O.P No. 2 herein got the service of her deceased husband on compassionate ground and also on the basis of the no objection certificate issued by the present petitioners to the Railway Authority. It is also the case of the petitioners that they issued the said no objection certificate on being assured by their daughter- in-law that she would maintain them after getting service of her deceased husband. But she did not keep her promise and never provided anything towards their maintenance. On the other hand she after getting the said service left her matrimonial home and started living at her brother's house.
(3.) AS against this, O.P No. 2 contested the said proceeding by filing written objection wherein the allegations made by the petitioners had been denied. It is specifically stated in that written objection that the petitioners were not entitled to get any maintenance from their widow daughter-in-law as per the provision of Section 125 of the Cr. P.C. Dismissal of the application under Section 125 Cr. P.C, had been so prayed for.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.