MST. SABANA AZMI Vs. MST. WAHIDA RAHAMAN & ORS.
LAWS(CAL)-2012-2-417
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on February 21,2012

Mst. Sabana Azmi Appellant
VERSUS
Mst. Wahida Rahaman And Ors. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

ASHIM KUMAR BANERJEE,J. - (1.) We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
(2.) The appellant is a necessary party. She was not a party to the writ petition. Hence, leave is granted to prefer the instant appeal.
(3.) The appeal is taken up for hearing by consent of parties. Mr. Shyamal Kumar De, learned counsel, being led by Mr. Jaharlal De, learned counsel, appears for the State being respondent nos. 2, 4, 5, 6 and 8, Mr. Asaraful Haque, learned counsel, appears for the respondent no. 1, Mr. Gautam Mukherjee, learned counsel, appears for the respondent no. 3 and Mr. Nirmalendu Patra, learned counsel, appears for the respondent no. 11.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.